Pages

'Last quarter mile' risk to central London bus users

London TravelWatch is the watchdog for London's public transport users. Westminster Living Streets thinks they are not doing enough to protect the safety of public transport users on the pedestrian leg of their journey

2A Montagu Mews South
London W1H 7ER

hugh@hugh-small.co.uk
Mr. Stephen Locke
Chair, London TravelWatch
169 Union Street
London SE1 0LL

8 November 2015

Dear Mr. Locke,

Westminster Living Streets, the local branch of the national charity that campaigns for pedestrians, supports your call for greater levels of priority for the bus (16 September), and we are glad that expansion of public transport at the expense of vehicles which use road space less efficiently has caused a 24 percent decline in vehicle miles in central London in the last 15 years. 

This expansion of public transport has put more pedestrians on central London’s streets, because walking ‘the last quarter mile’ is an indispensable and healthy part of the user’s journey. My concern is that the road capacity made redundant by the decline in motor traffic has not been reconfigured for the increasing number of pedestrians who must now share the road with motor vehicles. For example, standards for pedestrian crossing times have not increased since the 1950s despite the aging and slowing of the population. This neglect of the pedestrian portion of the public transport user’s journey has led to a steady increase in pedestrian casualties in Westminster over the last few years.[1]

I suggest that TravelWatch should urge the public transport operators to address the safety issues in this part of their business. A specific example is TfL’s failure to reduce maximum bus speeds to 15 mph on Oxford Street as the GLA Transport Committee requested some years ago. At the inquest on the latest of the eight pedestrians killed by buses on Oxford Street in the last eight years, the police witness praised the driver for driving at ‘only’ 20 mph with an empty road in front. This leads me to suspect that the operators have ordered a 20 mph maximum, showing that they at least recognise the danger.  A reduction to 15 mph would allow bus drivers to do a full emergency stop or swerve with less risk of injuring passengers. I believe that TravelWatch should insist on a scientific appraisal of safe maximum speeds, and not just on Oxford Street. Buses kill more pedestrians (mostly public transport users) in London than HGVs do.

A desirable further increase in public transport use in central London may be limited by the perceived risk to pedestrians on the ‘last quarter mile’ of their journey. I urge TravelWatch to draw this to the attention of TfL and the operators.

Yours sincerely
Hugh Small
Secretary, Westminster Living Streets